Recently there has been a push by Disney and others to remake classic animated films as live action films. With the upcoming live action versions of Ghost in the Shell and Beauty and the Beast, now is the perfect time to discuss if this is a good or completely unnecessary thing. I would posit that it can be good, but is often unnecessary. Let’s examine a few examples in alphabetical order:
Animal Farm (Animated 1954; Live Action 1999)
The British, animated version of Animal Farm still haunts my nightmares. The live action, made for TV version does not. That isn’t to say that the animated version didn’t deserve a live action update, it kind of does, but the version that they came up with just doesn’t work for me.
Verdict: Not a bad idea.
Beauty and the Beast (Animated 1991; Live Action 2017)
Disney’s Beauty and the Beast is a front-runner for greatest animated film of all time. It is responsible for the Disney Renaissance of the 1990’s, features great music, and stunning examples of the lost art of hand-drawn animation.
That isn’t to say a live action version is a bad idea. This spring’s release is highly anticipated, solidly cast, and looks good on the trailers. I’ll reserve judgment until I’ve actually seen it.
Verdict: Still an open question.
Charlotte’s Web (Animated 1973; Live Action 2006)
Charlotte’s Web is an undisputed classic of children’s literature. With source material this good, movies were inevitable. The first attempt was a 1973 Hanna/Barbera production notable for the fact that it is one of the few Hanna/Barbera projects based on a preexisting property.
The animated version remains a classic due to Debbie Reynolds’ voice-over work as Charlotte and a few catchy songs (some better than others). It’s not a perfect film, but it certainly captures the joy and sadness of E.B. White’s iconic novel.
Meanwhile, the 2006 version has way too many celebrity voices and is kind of creepy. It’s not a horrible film, just a waste of time given that the original, animated version still exists.
Cinderella (Animated, 1950; Live Action 2015)
The original Cinderella is a classic of the Disney catalogue, so much so that its reputation at this point is beyond criticism. Even so, the story of Cinderella isn’t so unique that it can’t do without an update or two. Arguably, remaking Beauty and the Beast has a higher degree of difficulty because it came out more recently and has a more unique take on a classic tale.
The live action version is pretty good. It’s not quite as good as the animated version but a solid film that stands on its own merits.
Verdict: There was no reason not to do this, and no reason to do this.
Ghost in the Shell (Animated 1995; Live Action 2017)
I’m tempted to reserve judgment on this one, but I’m not going to do that. First of all, remaking Ghost in the Shell with an American actress in the lead role is obnoxious. That should be enough to consider this a problem, but there’s actually another good reason why one shouldn’t remake this particular property.
While Ghost in the Shell is a landmark of anime, the original film suffers from some of the problems of anime – it’s somewhat opaque and has a lot of nudity and violence for the sake of there being nudity and violence. However, whatever value a live action remake could have has been supplanted by an excellent television series. The Stand Alone Complex television series does a much better job with the characters already without as many anime-related problems.
Verdict: Pointless Hollywood cash-grab.
Lord of the Rings (Animated 1978, 1980; Live Action 2001, 2002, 2003)
Let’s see. Mediocre animated adaptation versus one of the best films every made. Hmmmm.
Verdict: An absolutely necessary and brilliant idea.
There’s a few other examples, like 101 Dalmatians, but I’ll stop there.
(c) 2017 D.G. McCabe